Publications

Publications, Books, Book Chapters and Reviews by Prof. Marcus Maurer, MD

Use: Start with an overview of all publications. Use tag links to list selected documents or to list an entire category, e.g. Original Work, Books, Book Chapters, Reviews. If you know what you are looking for, enter this term in the search field.

Delayed pressure urticaria: a systematic review of treatment options

Filename 385. Kulthanan et al., DPU, JACIinPract2020.pdf
Filesize 364.85 KB
Version o.385
Date added October 6, 2020
Downloaded 4 times
Category Original Work
Tags Delayed pressure urticaria, systematic review, treatment
Authors Kulthanan, K., Ungprasert, P., Tuchinda, P., Chularojanamontri, L., Charoenpipatsin, N., and Maurer, M.
Citation Kulthanan, K., Ungprasert, P., Tuchinda, P., Chularojanamontri, L., Charoenpipatsin, N., and Maurer, M.: Delayed pressure urticaria: a systematic review of treatment options. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2020: 8; 2035-2049.
Corresponding authors Maurer, M.
DocNum o.385
DocType PDF
IF 8.86
Publisher J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract.
ReleaseDate 2020

BACKGROUND: Delayed pressure urticaria (DPU) is characterized by recurrent erythematous and often painful swelling after the skin is exposed to sustained pressure. Treatment is challenging. Antihistamines, the first-line and only approved treatment, are often not effective.
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the treatment options for DPU.
METHOD: A literature search of electronic databases for all relevant articles published till April 29, 2019, was conducted using the search terms “delayed pressure urticaria” and “pressure urticaria.” This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies (8 randomized controlled trials [RCTs], 10 retrospective cohort studies, and 3 open-label prospective studies) were included. Second-generation H1 antihistamines (sgAHs) were effective in 3 RCTs. The combination of an sgAH and montelukast (2 RCTs) or an sgAH and theophylline (1 non-RCT) was more effective than the sgAH alone. The disease improved with omalizumab (4 non-RCTs), sulphones (3 non-RCTs), oral prednisolone (1 RCT and 2 non-RCTs), intravenous immunoglobulin (1 non-RCT), and gluten-free diet (1 non-RCT). There are no studies on updosing of antihistamines over standard dosage in DPU.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the quality of studies on DPU is low. Because of the lack of other evidence, antihistamines remain the first-line therapy. Updosing of sgAHs could be considered in patients with uncontrolled symptoms on the basis of the extrapolation of evidence from chronic spontaneous urticaria, even though there is no evidence of its efficacy over standard dosage. Addition of montelukast may be considered. Omalizumab or sulphones may be used in treatment-resistant patients. High-quality DPU studies should be conducted.

 

(Last update: 12.2023)

Number of original publications in peer-reviewed journals:580
Number of reviews in peer-reviewed journals:210
Number of publications (original work and reviews) in peer-reviewed journals:790
Cumulative IF for original publications in peer-reviewed journals:4196.39
Cumulative IF for reviews in peer-reviewed journals:1409.32
Cumulative IF of publications (original work & reviews) in peer-reviewed journals:5605.71
Total number of citations: 36,836, h-index: 99 (Web of Science December 2023)36836

Download-Information

To be able to download the offered contents, you have to login. If you do not know the login, please write me your request.