Publications

Publications, Books, Book Chapters and Reviews by Prof. Marcus Maurer, MD

Use: Start with an overview of all publications. Use tag links to list selected documents or to list an entire category, e.g. Original Work, Books, Book Chapters, Reviews. If you know what you are looking for, enter this term in the search field.

Recommendations for assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes and Health-Related quality of life in clinical trials on allergy: a GA²LEN taskforce position paper

Filename 90. Baiardini et al.,Recommendations for assessing...,Allergy2010.pdf
Version o.090
Date added May 27, 2010
Downloaded 0 times
Category Original Work
Authors Baiardini, I., Bousquet, P. J., Brzoza, Z., Canonica, G. W., Compalati, E., Fiocchi, A., Fokkens, W., van Wijk, G. R., La Grutta, S., Lombardi, C., Maurer, M. Pinto, A. M., Ridolo, E., Senna, G. E., Terreehorst, I., Bom, A. T., Bousquet, J., Zuberbier, T., and Braido, F.
Citation Baiardini, I., Bousquet, P. J., Brzoza, Z., Canonica, G. W., Compalati, E., Fiocchi, A., Fokkens, W., van Wijk, G. R., La Grutta, S., Lombardi, C., Maurer, M. Pinto, A. M., Ridolo, E., Senna, G. E., Terreehorst, I., Bom, A. T., Bousquet, J., Zuberbier, T., and Braido, F.: Recommendations for assessing patient-reported outcomes and health-related quality of life in clinical trials on allergy: A GA²LEN taskforce position paper. Allergy 2010: 65; 290-295.
Corresponding authors Baiardini, I.
DocNum o.090
Edition; Page 65; 290-295
IF 6.29
Publisher Allergy
ReleaseDate 2010

The aim of this Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA²LEN) consensus report is to provide recommendations for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) evaluation in clinical trials for allergic diseases, which constitute a global health problem in terms of physical, psychological economic and social impact. During the last 40 years, PROs have gained large consideration and use in the scientific community, to gain a better understanding of patients’ subjective assessment with respect to elements concerning their health condition. They include all health-related reports coming from the patient, without involvement or interpretation by physician or others. PROs assessment should be performed by validated tools (disease-specific tools when available or generic ones) selected taking into account the aim of the study, the expected intervention effects and the determinant and confounding factors or patient-related factors which could influence PROs. Moreover, each tool should be used exclusively in the patient population following the authors’ indications without modification and performing a cross-cultural validation if the tool must be used in a language that differs from the original. The result analysis also suggests that the relevance of PROs results in any interventional study should include a pre–post assessment providing information concerning statistical differences within or among groups, rates of response for the PROs and a minimal important difference for the population. The report underlines the importance of further investigation on some topics, such as the quality assessment of existing PROs tools, the definition of inclusion and exclusion criteria and a more extensive evaluation of the correlation between PROs, besides health-related quality of life, and clinical data.

 

(Last update: 12.2023)

Number of original publications in peer-reviewed journals:580
Number of reviews in peer-reviewed journals:210
Number of publications (original work and reviews) in peer-reviewed journals:790
Cumulative IF for original publications in peer-reviewed journals:4196.39
Cumulative IF for reviews in peer-reviewed journals:1409.32
Cumulative IF of publications (original work & reviews) in peer-reviewed journals:5605.71
Total number of citations: 36,836, h-index: 99 (Web of Science December 2023)36836

Download-Information

To be able to download the offered contents, you have to login. If you do not know the login, please write me your request.